12/09/2022
"The performers at the opening demonstrated with apparent skill the usefulness of the object. In reality, these performances were performed by "real actors", who were invited and paid to do what they usually do on the sidewalks and at intersections. Is it bad taste to disguise human misery in this way as a show for art lovers or is it a political act to present a reality we can no longer see? "
Exchange
Gaston Saint-Pierre
The work of the “Mute” project proceeds by a commodification of various structural paradigms. In the use of language in everyday life, it is often the function that gives the object its name; a ” work of art “, on the other hand, remains an object titled and manipulated by the ideology in place.
s much this object now practical gains in sense in a daily newspaper, as much it describes the situation in which it persists and brings us to reconsider its place in the spheres of the art.
It is thus following a practical experience of the object that one can speculate that there is “art”, that there is meaning.
😲
😲
😲
😲
😲
😲
😲
😲
😲
😲
😲
😲